Leire Rincón on evidence, ideas, and the race for political attention

Listen on:

Politicians and lobbyists alike dream of the silver bullet: a single killer piece of scientific evidence that will change all our minds about future policymaking. But could any simple piece of evidence have the power to beat big ideas in public debate? And can evidence garner political attention even when the politicians don’t go looking for it?

Dr Leire Rincón García’s field research on the policy of Universal Basic Income seems to suggest that the answer is ‘no’. In this episode, Dr Rincón and Toby Wardman together debate why parliamentarians were more likely to ignore emails that cited evidence, what could be done about it, and whether there is a defensible role for the ‘activist scientist’ in policy advice.

Resources mentioned in this episode

Latest podcasts

Rémi Quirion on the languages of global science advice

The emergence of English as the dominant international language of science has some significant downsides. As part of his presidency of the International Network for Governmental Science Advice, Professor Rémi Quirion of Québec has made it his mission to broaden our linguistic outlook.

Read More

to our newsletter